Outbound Wiki

Article

Fifth Circuit Upends Longstanding TCPA Written Consent Rule

mvalaw.com

Open at publisher

Quoted on this wiki

Every place a page here uses this source, in the order the words come in it.

  1. Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that telemarketing robocalls do not require written consent under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”). Regulatory Background and the Fifth Circuit’s Decision

    In Consent-based calling exceptions

  2. Regulatory Background and the Fifth Circuit’s Decision Nevertheless, for nearly 15 years, essentially every court has accepted and applied the FCC’s prior express written consent requirement. Not so in Bradford v. Sovereign Pest Control of TX, Inc.  There, the plaintiff alleged familiar TCPA allegations that a company had sent him unsolicited, prerecorded messages without obtaining written consent.  The district court dismissed the case because the messages at issue were “informational,” not “telemarketing,” and thus were not required to meet the stringent standard of “prior express written consent.”

    In Consent-based calling exceptions