Outbound Wiki

PDF

23 Understanding and accounting for the costs of inaction

eea.europa.eu

Open at publisher

Quoted on this wiki

Every place a page here uses this source, in the order the words come in it.

  1. Page 1

    “Finally, in the case of air pollution, making use of different estimates for mortality risk avoidance will help decision-makers to see that there are higher- and lower-bound estimates for the costs of inaction.” Reducing emission loads will also tend to bring relief for the intangible assets of biodiversity and nature. Making the best use of environmental science and modelling helps to make environmental protection and precaution a priority. Producing cost estimates should not be left to economists alone, but should rather be seen as a starting point for a broader discussion, featuring also the relevant expertise in health, ecology, demography, modelling and science. Well researched estimates, based on interdisciplinary collaboration, can strengthen some of those scattered and diffuse interests, which during the ordinary processes of policy-making have difficulty making their voices heard.

    In Cost of inaction

  2. Page 1

    “This is a reminder that figures for the costs of inaction have often been grossly underestimated.” Reducing emission loads will also tend to bring relief for the intangible assets of biodiversity and nature. Making the best use of environmental science and modelling helps to make environmental protection and precaution a priority. Producing cost estimates should not be left to economists alone, but should rather be seen as a starting point for a broader discussion, featuring also the relevant expertise in health, ecology, demography, modelling and science. Well researched estimates, based on interdisciplinary collaboration, can strengthen some of those scattered and diffuse interests, which during the ordinary processes of policy-making have difficulty making their voices heard.

    In Cost of inaction

  3. Page 1

    “The case studies also provide insights into how early warning signals might provide a basis for estimating the costs of inaction, when the science base is less consolidated.” Reducing emission loads will also tend to bring relief for the intangible assets of biodiversity and nature. Making the best use of environmental science and modelling helps to make environmental protection and precaution a priority. Producing cost estimates should not be left to economists alone, but should rather be seen as a starting point for a broader discussion, featuring also the relevant expertise in health, ecology, demography, modelling and science. Well researched estimates, based on interdisciplinary collaboration, can strengthen some of those scattered and diffuse interests, which during the ordinary processes of policy-making have difficulty making their voices heard.

    In Cost of inaction

Quotes are verbatim and belong to their publishers. Where a quote has been translated, the original wording is kept below it.