Outbound Wiki

Partner qualification and tiering

Assessing a prospective partner’s fit, capabilities and commitment, then assigning an appropriate partner tier.

Qualify a partner against how the relationship must work, then tier it according to the support and effort that relationship calls for. The strongest signal is whether the partner can carry the offer through its own sales motion, customer relationships, and economics. Build the programme around those parts of the partner's business. That gives you a better test than a generic distribution offer.1 Many programmes produce signed agreements and then go quiet within 18 months.2

Build the profile before you qualify

Use a profile in a real conversation. It gives both sides a shared standard for deciding who merits more investigation and who should leave the process early.

First assess your own partnership readiness honestly.3 Define the ideal partner before reviewing individual companies, so you know which partners merit investment.4

Include the capabilities, specialization, geographic coverage, and go-to-market fit you need.5 Add financial strength, sales and technical personnel, marketing capability, growth plans, capacity to invest in a new supplier, and management vision.6

Use subjective and objective criteria in the profile.7 Objective checks might cover customer reach, capabilities, and commercial potential. Subjective checks should cover how the people work together and whether they can build trust through a difficult delivery or sales cycle.

Shortlist partners that fit your offering and influence your target customers.8 Compare both companies' Ideal Customer Profiles before spending time on a joint plan.9

Run qualification in work order

Run qualification as a sequence of gates. Test fit first, then the partner's ability to execute, the commercial case, and the commitment on both sides.

Vet partners early, before spending sales time on every possibility. This separates high-quality leads from wasted time when account mapping produces many possible co-selling partners.10

Customer fit

Start with the customers the partner already serves. Ask which customer groups it knows best and where it already has trusted access. Then ask which customer problem would make your offer relevant.

Listen for a specific customer profile and a clear path to those buyers. Vague answers mean you are still having a recruiting conversation, not making a qualification decision. Move on when the partner can explain who it serves, why those customers would care, and where your offer enters the conversation.

Capability

Map the work the partner would own. Ask whether it would sell the product, deliver it, refer it, or combine those roles. Ask what people, skills, and processes would support that work.

A channel partner program enables outside companies to sell, deliver, or refer a product.11 Ask for a recent example of comparable work and find out what the partner handled personally. Move on when the answer shows a capability you need and you can verify it through the partner's operating history.

Collaboration

Test how the relationship will run when responsibilities overlap. Ask how the partner makes decisions with a supplier, handles shared ownership of an opportunity, and responds when the customer needs work outside its usual scope.

Listen for direct answers, clear ownership, and a willingness to solve problems together. A partner that describes the relationship only in terms of receiving leads or margin has not shown enough working fit.

Commercial case

Make the economics concrete while the partner is still evaluating the opportunity. Selection should cover potential reach, how well you can work together, and whether the partner can contribute to quality leads.12

When the motion involves an event, discuss expected attendance and calculate possible earnings from the product price, typical conversion rate, and commission structure.13 Ask what would make this worth the effort for the team and what would prevent it from pursuing the opportunity.

Move on when the partner can explain the customer value and its own reason to invest. A partner that cannot make the economics work will struggle to sustain activity after the initial conversation.

Commitment

Make the operating exchange explicit. State what you will provide and what the partner will do with it.

Give partners a clear way to make money, sales training, activity-tracking tools, and support when conflicts arise.14 In return, partners commit sales representatives, follow your qualification process, register deals, and meet a performance standard.15

Ask who will own the first opportunity, what the partner will do before the next customer conversation, and what support it needs from you. Move on when both sides can state the first actions without being prompted.

Assign the tier after qualification

Qualification tells you whether the relationship is workable. Tiering sets the level of support and the partner effort that support requires.

Direct resources toward the partners you can engage and enable effectively.16 Tiers are the traditional segmentation method, used as the primary method by 98% of top IT partner programs.17 The standard practice is to use an average of three tiers.18

Keep the structure simple enough for a partner to understand during qualification. Use a points-based approach when deciding whether a partner enters the program and where it sits within the program.19

Set eligibility first. A partner that misses customer fit, capability, commercial logic, or commitment should leave the process without a tier. A qualified partner can then earn placement through the strength of its fit and the effort it is prepared to make.

Use revenue attainment as the primary movement measure, then add indicators that show whether the relationship is healthy. Partner programs have expanded tiering criteria to include certifications and customer satisfaction.20 Use effort and engagement to decide how much resource each tier receives.21

Write each tier as an exchange. State the partner's required effort, the support available, and the result that would justify movement upward. Keep benefits usable in the partner's actual sales motion, customer relationships, and economics. The tier should make the next commitment easy to understand before either side signs anything.

What not to do

These mistakes can make a partner look qualified on paper while leaving the operating relationship untested.

  • Treat a partner programme as a distribution deal.22
  • Skip the check on whether the partner brings capabilities you lack.23
  • Give every partner the same level of support.24
  • Raise the benefits of a tier without raising its requirements.25
  • Recruit a partner that cannot describe its own customer profile with confidence.26

Take the profile into the next partner call and use the gates in order. Record the fit decision, the commitments on both sides, and the tier exchange before spending enablement time.

Sources

  1. 1
    “They are built as a business model for the partner, one that fits their sales motion, their customer relationships, their economics.”
  2. 2
    “The difference between those two approaches is why most partner programmes produce a flurry of signed agreements and then go quiet within 18 months.”
  3. 3
    “It starts with an honest self-evaluation of partnership readiness.”
  4. 4
    “By proactively profiling what [an ideal] channel partner looks like . . . you can have a much better understanding of what to expect and which partners you would want to invest in.”
  5. 5
    “This might be a particular set of skills and competencies, a verticalised or software specialism, coverage of a certain geographic area, or close alignment with a go-to-market (GTM) strategy.”
  6. 6
    “Several factors to consider when building this profile (in addition to the obvious five major opportunity areas listed above) include the partner’s financials, the number of sales and technical personnel, their marketing capabilities, their growth plans, their commitment and ability to invest in a new supplier, and their management vision.”
  7. 7
    “Keep in mind you will have to evaluate both subjective and objective criteria in the partner selection process.”
  8. 8
    “Identify potential partners that align with your offering and have influence over your target customers and begin to make a shortlist.”
  9. 9
    “According to Gagnon, a key factor in determining alignment is comparing the Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) for both companies.”
  10. 10
    “While your account mapping exercise might have yielded a high number of partners for co-selling possibilities, early-stage vetting can make the difference between high-quality leads and wasted time for your sales team.”
  11. 11
    “A channel partner program is the operating system that lets other companies sell, deliver, or refer your product.”
  12. 12
    “These aren’t the only criteria for selecting a webinar partner; you also need to evaluate their potential reach, how well you can work together as a team, and whether they would contribute to generating quality leads, to name a few.”
  13. 13
    “One way that I figure out whether or not someone will be a good partner is to set up a call with a potential affiliate and talk to them about the numbers, starting with how many people they think they can get to the event. Then based on that number, you can calculate right there on the call how much they could possibly earn based on your product price, your typical conversion rate, and your typical commission structure.”
  14. 14
    “You give partners a clear way to make money, the training to sell well, the tools to track activity, and air cover when conflicts come up.”
  15. 15
    “In return, partners commit reps to your product, follow your qualification process, register deals, and meet a performance bar.”
  16. 16
    “Aligning resources to engage and enable the right ones is crucial.”
  17. 17
    “The traditional channel partner segmentation and prioritization approach, and the primary method used by 98% of the top IT (information technology) partner programs, is tiers (or levels).”
  18. 18
    “The standard practice is to categorize partners into an average of three tiers, using a naming convention that conveys “good, better, best.””
  19. 19
    “Consider some version of this when deciding whether a partner is in or out of a program or what tier they’re in.”
  20. 20
    “Over the years, programs have expanded to include tiering criteria such as certifications and customer satisfaction.”
  21. 21
    “How will you handle differing levels of mindshare, interest and engagement among your partners? Will you offer tiers of partnership with resources allotted according to their effort? Will all partners be treated the same?”
  22. 22
    “Most companies treat a partner programme as a distribution deal.”
  23. 23
    “There is no partner qualification, no honest partner value proposition, no check on whether the partner brings capabilities you actually lack.”
  24. 24
    “That said, it is unwise and unrealistic to support all partners in your ecosystem equally.”
  25. 25
    “Each program tier has a higher level of requirements in return for a higher level of benefits.”
  26. 26
    “And it’s important to recruit partners who are confident in the profile of their own customers.”