Outbound Wiki

Partner qualification and tiering

Assessing a prospective partner’s fit, capabilities and commitment, then assigning an appropriate partner tier.

Qualify a partner by how it makes money, reaches customers, delivers value, and commits resources. Then tier the relationship according to the work the partner will do and the support that work earns. A partner can look attractive on paper and still fail if the program does not fit its sales motion, customer relationships, and economics. Programs treated as distribution deals often produce a burst of signed agreements that become inactive within 18 months.1 Effective programs are built as a business model for the partner and fit its sales motion, customer relationships, and economics.2

Run the qualification in this order

  1. Profile
  2. Fit
  3. Commitment
  4. Decision
  5. Tier

Use this sequence on every partner call. It moves from fit to commitment, then from eligibility to the support level the relationship has earned.

Stage What you are trying to learn Example question
Profile whether the partner reaches the customers you need Which customers do you reach best, and where?
Fit what the partner can add to the relationship What can you do for our customers that we cannot do ourselves?
Commitment what the partner will put behind the work What would you put behind this partnership if we agree?
Decision whether the evidence meets your entry standard What would make this worth continuing?
Tier what level of activity and support makes sense What level of activity can you sustain, and what support would help?

Start with your own readiness

Before qualifying a partner, decide what the partnership must accomplish and what you are prepared to provide. That keeps the call focused on a workable exchange.

A working partner program starts with an honest assessment of partnership readiness.3 Use a real qualification method, such as the 4C method.4 Define a partner value proposition and check whether the partner brings capabilities you actually lack.5

Give partners a clear way to make money, sales training, activity tracking tools, and support when conflicts come up.6 Treat the relationship as a collaboration from the first conversation.7

Before contacting a candidate, write down the capability you need, the customer access you expect, and the commitment you will ask for. If you cannot explain those points, pause the qualification and fix the program first.

Build the ideal partner profile

Write the profile before reviewing individual candidates. It gives everyone the same test and keeps an impressive logo from replacing a fit assessment.

Shortlist potential partners that fit your offering and influence your target customers.8 Compare the ideal customer profile for both companies when assessing alignment.9

An ideal partner profile may specify skills and competencies, a vertical or software specialism, geographic coverage, or close fit with a go to market strategy.10 Also examine financials, sales and technical personnel, marketing capabilities, growth plans, commitment and ability to invest in a new supplier, and management vision.11

Assess culture, values, work ethic, and the partner's mindset toward collaboration.12 Ask for evidence behind each answer. A profile that says the partner has reach is incomplete until you know which customers it can reach, through which motion, and with what level of access.

Test fit and capability

The fit conversation should produce evidence you can use in the decision record. Listen for a clear customer relationship and a specific capability that improves the route to market.

Selection should cover potential reach, ability to work together, and contribution to generating quality leads.13 Review the partner's marketing activity and past success to estimate the reach the partnership could provide.14

Ask: "Well, who do they partner with that are good fits and that are who are bad fits?".15

Follow that question with your own checks. Which customer groups respond to your work? What part of the selling or delivery process would you own? Where have similar collaborations worked, and where have they stalled? Move on when the partner can answer with specific relationships, actions, and examples.

Test commitment and economics

Interest sounds positive on a first call. Commitment shows up in the work the partner will accept, the resources it will assign, and the economics it can defend.

Partners are expected to commit sales representatives, follow the vendor's qualification process, register deals, and meet a performance standard.16 Assess whether the partner fits and is motivated to sell the product or solution.17

For a partner promoting an event or affiliate offer, discuss expected attendance and calculate possible earnings from the product price, typical conversion rate, and commission structure.18 Use the same logic for other partner motions: ask what the partner can put into the motion, what result it expects, and why the return deserves its attention.

Ask what activity the partner will own, who will do the work, and what would cause the commitment to stop. Move on when the answers describe a repeatable motion with a plausible payoff. Record promises as commitments, not as evidence of performance.

Turn evidence into eligibility and tier

Eligibility and tiering are separate decisions. First decide whether the partner belongs in the program. Then decide how much access, enablement, and attention the current evidence supports.

A points based approach can help decide whether a partner enters the program or which tier it receives.19 Evaluate both subjective and objective criteria in the selection process.20 Keep the scorecard short enough to use during the call, and attach a note to every score so another person can see why it was given.

Ask the tiering questions directly: "How will you handle differing levels of mindshare, interest and engagement among your partners? Will you offer tiers of partnership with resources allotted according to their effort? Will all partners be treated the same?".21

Programs traditionally categorize partners into an average of three tiers, using names that convey "good, better, best".22 Use the tier set that your team can administer consistently. Make the starting tier reflect observed fit and commitment, then let movement depend on demonstrated activity.

Tier criteria have expanded to include certifications and customer satisfaction.23 Revenue attainment remains the primary criterion for moving to a higher tier in most partner programs.24 Use revenue as a core measure while checking the other signals that show whether the relationship is producing a good customer experience and a capable delivery motion.

What not to do

These mistakes turn qualification into a ranking exercise and make tier benefits hard to defend.

  • Give every partner the same level of support. Equal support across the ecosystem is unwise and unrealistic.25
  • Offer higher benefits without higher requirements. Each tier pairs higher requirements with higher benefits.26
  • Skip early stage vetting. It can separate high quality partner leads from wasted sales team time.27

Take the profile and scorecard into the next partner conversation. Record the evidence you hear and assign support only after the partner's commitments are clear.

Sources

  1. 1
    “The difference between those two approaches is why most partner programmes produce a flurry of signed agreements and then go quiet within 18 months.”
  2. 2
    “They are built as a business model for the partner, one that fits their sales motion, their customer relationships, their economics.”
  3. 3
    “It starts with an honest self-evaluation of partnership readiness.”
  4. 4
    “It uses a real qualification method (I use the 4C method).”
  5. 5
    “There is no partner qualification, no honest partner value proposition, no check on whether the partner brings capabilities you actually lack.”
  6. 6
    “You give partners a clear way to make money, the training to sell well, the tools to track activity, and air cover when conflicts come up.”
  7. 7
    “It names the relationship as collaborative, not transactional.”
  8. 8
    “Identify potential partners that align with your offering and have influence over your target customers and begin to make a shortlist.”
  9. 9
    “According to Gagnon, a key factor in determining alignment is comparing the Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) for both companies.”
  10. 10
    “This might be a particular set of skills and competencies, a verticalised or software specialism, coverage of a certain geographic area, or close alignment with a go-to-market (GTM) strategy.”
  11. 11
    “Several factors to consider when building this profile (in addition to the obvious five major opportunity areas listed above) include the partner’s financials, the number of sales and technical personnel, their marketing capabilities, their growth plans, their commitment and ability to invest in a new supplier, and their management vision.”
  12. 12
    “Analyzing a potential partner’s culture, values, work ethic and mindset toward collaboration are critically important in identifying which partners to target.”
  13. 13
    “These aren’t the only criteria for selecting a webinar partner; you also need to evaluate their potential reach, how well you can work together as a team, and whether they would contribute to generating quality leads, to name a few.”
  14. 14
    “This allows you to see the potential reach you could gain by partnering with them on a webinar.”
  15. 15
    “Well, who do they partner with that are good fits and that are who are bad fits?”
  16. 16
    “In return, partners commit reps to your product, follow your qualification process, register deals, and meet a performance bar.”
  17. 17
    “Ultimately, Partners are people and you need to be able to read between the lines to know whether they’ll be a good fit and be motivated to sell your products and solutions.”
  18. 18
    “One way that I figure out whether or not someone will be a good partner is to set up a call with a potential affiliate and talk to them about the numbers, starting with how many people they think they can get to the event. Then based on that number, you can calculate right there on the call how much they could possibly earn based on your product price, your typical conversion rate, and your typical commission structure.”
  19. 19
    “Consider some version of this when deciding whether a partner is in or out of a program or what tier they’re in.”
  20. 20
    “Keep in mind you will have to evaluate both subjective and objective criteria in the partner selection process.”
  21. 21
    “How will you handle differing levels of mindshare, interest and engagement among your partners? Will you offer tiers of partnership with resources allotted according to their effort? Will all partners be treated the same?”
  22. 22
    “The standard practice is to categorize partners into an average of three tiers, using a naming convention that conveys “good, better, best.””
  23. 23
    “Over the years, programs have expanded to include tiering criteria such as certifications and customer satisfaction.”
  24. 24
    “Revenue attainment is still the primary criterion, however, for moving up to a higher tier in most partner programs.”
  25. 25
    “That said, it is unwise and unrealistic to support all partners in your ecosystem equally.”
  26. 26
    “Each program tier has a higher level of requirements in return for a higher level of benefits.”
  27. 27
    “While your account mapping exercise might have yielded a high number of partners for co-selling possibilities, early-stage vetting can make the difference between high-quality leads and wasted time for your sales team.”